ABC Heart Fail Cardiomyop 2024; 4(2): e20240035

Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Acute Heart Failure According to the Universal Ejection Fraction Classification

Michelle Bozko Collini ORCID logo , Gustavo Sarot Pereira da Cunha ORCID logo , Leonardo Henrique dos Santos de Melo ORCID logo , Matheus Bissa Duarte Ferreira ORCID logo , Jorge Tadashi Daikubara Neto ORCID logo , Rafael Moretti ORCID logo , Carolina Ruschel Senger ORCID logo , Karoline Cordeiro Vercka ORCID logo , Jessica Tamires Reichert ORCID logo , Lucas Muller Prado ORCID logo , Jamilly Giuriatti Anziliero ORCID logo , Eduardo Leal Adam ORCID logo , Raphael Henrique Déa Cirino ORCID logo , Miguel Morita Fernandes-Silva ORCID logo

DOI: 10.36660/abchf.20240035i

Abstract

Background:

The universal classification of heart failure (HF) defined four categories based on ejection fraction (EF). Although it has been shown these EF-based categories have distinct prognoses and responses to treatment, most of the data has been focused on chronic HF.

Objectives:

We compared the prognosis and characteristics of patients with acute HF according to the universal EF classification.

Methods:

We performed a prospective cohort study of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital for acute HF. Patients were classified into the four categories of the universal EF classification: reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), preserved (HFpEF), and improved (HFimpEF), based on an echocardiogram conducted during the hospitalization. The primary outcome was all-cause death in six months of follow-up.

Results:

153 patients hospitalized for acute HF (67.2 ± 14.9 years, 50.3% female, EF = 43.8 ± 17.6%) were included, being 52% HFrEF, 35% HFpEF, 12% HFmrEF, and 1% HFimpEF. HFrEF patients were more likely to have an ischemic etiology (42.5%), while HFpEF patients were more likely female (67.3%), had hypertension (90.9%) and atrial fibrillation (49.1%). Six-month mortality was similar among HFrEF, HFpEF, and HFmrEF categories (15% vs 20% vs 11%, respectively, Log-rank p = 0.75), and change in EF from a previous echocardiogram was not associated with outcomes.

Conclusion:

In patients with acute HF, the EF categories from the universal classification had similar mortality rates. The proportion of patients with improved EF was very small in patients with acute HF and improvement of EF was not associated with better outcomes.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Acute Heart Failure According to the Universal Ejection Fraction Classification

Comments

Skip to content